Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396419›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Optimizing lens and organ dose evaluation in head CT examinations using monte carlo simulation: influence of gantry tilt and scan range.

Yasushi Katsunuma, Kaoru Sato, Takayuki Hasegawa, Yusuke Koba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasushi KatsunumaTokai University Hospital, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan. katunuma@tokai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-6472
Kaoru SatoJapan Atomic Energy Agency, 2-4 Shirakata, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki, 319-1195, Japan.
Takayuki HasegawaTokai University Hachioji Hospital, 1838 Ishikawa-machi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0032, Japan.
Yusuke KobaNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To minimize radiation exposure to the eye lens during head computed tomography examinations, we performed a high-precision Monte Carlo simulation using the particle and heavy ion transport code system to investigate the effects of gantry tilt angle and scan range on the dose to the lens and other radiosensitive organs. Utilizing a source model with a 2 mm beam width, we visualized the sharp dose peak and the subsequent gradually attenuating tail in the dose distribution to the lens, quantitatively demonstrating that even minor adjustments in the tilt angle or slice position can markedly impact the lens dose. The tilt angle was defined relative to the orbitomeatal line; an upward tilt of +5˚ or more reduced the lens dose by up to 87%. Additionally, a -35˚ downward tilt substantially reduced the lens dose, which is attributed to the presence of high-attenuation tissues in the x-ray path. For organs such as the salivary glands, thyroid, and oral mucosa, scan range adjustments affect the effective dose, with up to a 1.5-fold difference observed depending on whether the eyeballs were included in the scan. These findings underscore the critical importance of a precise protocol design, including the gantry tilt and slice range, in minimizing radiation exposure to multiple organs and provide valuable insights into radiation protection and protocol optimization.

Indexed as

HeadLens, CrystallineMonte Carlo MethodRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansEffective doseEye lens doseGantry tiltHead CTMonte Carlo simulation

Identifiers

PMID41396419
PMCPMC12950018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.