Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396416›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Subtraction-based Stepwise computed tomography post-processing with probabilistically adjusted thresholding for fat-ice demarcation: an in situ study.

Chihiro Itou, Yoshiki Ishihara, Atsushi Urikura, Miyuki Sone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chihiro ItouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. chitou@ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-3515
Yoshiki IshiharaDepartment of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1931-9337
Atsushi UrikuraDepartment of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5799-0944
Miyuki SoneDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-1500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraprocedural visualization of the iceball boundary is often limited at the fat-ice interface, where frozen fat-despite increased computed tomography (CT) values-remains within the negative range, thus yielding limited contrast with non-frozen fat. This limitation is relevant in CT-guided renal cryoablation involving perirenal fat. We evaluated a stepwise CT post-processing method of subtraction and scaled addition with probabilistically adjusted thresholding, using an in situ fat-muscle phantom. This two-step process involved fixed zero-threshold subtraction (Step 1: post-freezing image minus pre-freezing image) and kernel density estimation-based threshold subtraction (Step 2: Step 1 output minus post-freezing image), based on pixel-wise fat-attenuation distributions. Contrast-to-noise ratio improved in both fat and non-fat tissues. In fat tissue, boundary contrast selectively increased by reducing CT values in non-frozen regions, whereas in non-fat tissue, by reducing them in frozen regions. Iceball boundaries aligned with magnetic resonance imaging. This approach may improve iceball demarcation and warrants validation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueIceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSubtraction TechniqueTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, ImagingProbabilitySignal-To-Noise RatioIceComputed tomography-guided cryoablationFrozen/non-frozen fat boundaryIceball visualizationImage subtractionKernel density estimationPhantom study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.