ArticleGeroScience2026
Effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in patients affected by severe dementia.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phase 1, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics study of bisnorcymserine, a highly selective inhibitor of butyrylcholinesterase.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Why acetylcholinesterase inhibitors should be considered disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease?Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI) and memantine (ME) in severe dementia remains uncertain, and real world data are limited. We evaluated the progression of cognitive decline and mortality rates in a cohort of outpatients with severe dementia treated with AChEI and/or ME or not treated, from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (NACC-UDS). Overall, 703 patients (mean age:78.3 ± 7.2 years; females:56.1%) with severe dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination-MMSE ≤ 10/30) were included [407 late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), 126 Lewy body dementia (LBD), 170 vascular dementia (VD)]. Patients were grouped by treatment status: untreated (AChEI - /ME - ; n.70), AChEI only (AChEI + ; n.294), ME only (ME + ; n.215), combined therapy (AChEI + /ME + ; n.124). During follow-up (mean:1.7 ± 0.3 years; range:0.2-2.9 years) the mean MMSE scores declined by - 1.7 points (Standard Deviation: -1.55 to -1.9) in AChEI - /ME - (p for trend:0.001), - 1.5 points (-1.55 to -1.9) in AChEI + (p:0.001), - 0.7 points (-0.5 to -0.9) in ME + (p:0.09), while it increased by + 0.7 points (+ 0.4 to + 1.0) in AChEI + /ME + (p:0.001). Survival rates were 8% in AChEI - /ME - , 10% in AChEI + , 28% in ME + , and 49% in AChEI + /ME + . In Cox proportional hazards analysis (age and sex adjusted), AChEI + /ME + exhibited a 39% reduction in total mortality compared with no treatment (HR:0.61; 95%CI:0.49-0.77; p < 0.001), ME + displayed a 22% reduction (HR:0.78; 95%CI:0.65-0.94; p:0.007), while AChEI + showed no association (HR:0.97; 95%CI:0.80-1.18; p:0.75). When the Cox proportional hazards models were stratified by dementia subtype, consistent significant patterns were observed in LOAD and LBD. In this real-world cohort of older adults with severe dementia, the combination therapy (ME + AchEI) seems to be associated with the best outcomes, including a stabilization of cognitive function and reduced total mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.