ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026
Enhancing diagnostic information in abdominal computed tomography (CT) images through optimized image enhancement techniques.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In medical imaging, particularly in enhancing computed tomography (CT) scan images, improving image quality while preserving diagnostic content is critical for detecting different types of abnormalities, especially in cases such as tumors, inflammatory conditions, or vascular issues. This paper proposes a novel image enhancement pipeline that integrates several image enhancement techniques into a sequential workflow that is specifically designed for abdominal CT scan images. The proposed pipeline combines windowing, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization, denoising via non-local means, and unsharp masking to concurrently address several issues affecting the quality of the images. Unlike existing methods, the proposed combinational approach improves contrast, suppresses noise, and sharpens structural detail, guaranteeing the balance between the enhancement and the diagnostic integrity. The workflow was evaluated on datasets from The Cancer Imaging Archive and the Medical Segmentation Decathlon. The proposed approach is assessed using key image quality metrics, yielding an average Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio of 31.79 dB, Universal Image Quality Index of 0.96, Feature Similarity Index of 0.93, Absolute Mean Brightness Error of 7.12, and Edge Content of 7.78. These results indicate significant improvements in contrast enhancement, noise reduction, and the preservation of structural details. We performed an additional qualitative analysis by generating histograms and saliency maps that further confirm the method's effectiveness in enhancing the diagnostic quality of the CT images for both clinical and research purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.