ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Performance evaluation of the ACTIVE 7 MAX benchtop preclinical PET scanner in accordance with the NEMA NU 4-2008 standard.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionACTIVE 7 MAX is a compact benchtop preclinical PET scanner dedicated to high sensitivity and high-resolution imaging of small animals. This study evaluated the performance of the ACTIVE 7 MAX system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 4-2008 standard protocol.
methodsThe scanner consists of four rings, each containing 14 detector modules. Each detector module is made up of a 16 × 16 array of lutetium yttrium orthosilicate (LYSO) scintillation crystals, with each crystal measuring 1.47 × 1.47 × 10.0 mm
resultsThe average energy resolution for the 56 detector modules in the system was found to be 11.46% in Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM). The filtered back-projection (FBP) image spatial resolution of a point source varied from 1.57 to 1.81 mm in the radial direction and from 1.58 to 1.71 mm in the tangential direction within the radius of 25 mm. For the Derenzo phantom imaging, the hot rod with a diameter of 1.25 mm was identified. With an energy window of 350-650 keV, the sensitivity at the center of the scanner was 4.18%. The peak noise equivalent count rate (NECR) of 103 kcps was achieved at 22 MBq, and the scatter fraction (SF) is 12%. The reconstructed images of the NEMA image quality phantom show a uniformity of 5.0%, and recovery coefficients for rods with diameters of 1 mm and 5 mm ranging from 0.14 to 0.93. The spillover rates for air-filled and water-filled cold regions were 0.08 and 0.03, respectively.
conclusionThis study evaluated the performance of the ACTIVE 7 MAX preclinical PET system. The results demonstrated excellent imaging performance for molecular imaging in biomedical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.