Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396336›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2026

Intergenerational healthcare ethics: considering conceptualizations of generations and their collective and temporal dimensions.

Niklas Ellerich-Groppe, Claudia Bozzaro, Dominik Koesling, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Silke Schicktanz, Mark Schweda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niklas Ellerich-GroppeDivision of Ethics in Medicine, Department for Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. niklas.ellerich-groppe@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-0506
Claudia BozzaroInstitute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2480-7787
Dominik KoeslingInstitute for Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-6467
Christoph Rehmann-SutterInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies (IMGWF), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7642-5556
Silke SchicktanzDepartment for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-752X
Mark SchwedaDivision of Ethics in Medicine, Department for Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-6561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current challenges in medicine and healthcare raise new questions regarding the moral relations between generations, thus highlighting the increasing relevance of intergenerational perspectives in healthcare ethics. However, the underlying notions of generations often remain vague and heterogeneous. This contribution aims to clarify the scope of conceptual meanings of 'generation' through explication and differentiation in order to advance the analytical potential of intergenerational perspectives in healthcare ethics. We argue that the concept of generations needs theoretical elaboration with regard to the dimensions of collectivity and temporality. We first introduce three approaches towards the theoretical conceptualization of generations: a genealogical, a chronological, and a socio-cultural approach. Regardless of their differences, all three essentially share an understanding of generations as collectives situated in time. Accordingly, we then examine the scope of underlying notions of collectivity and temporality, touching upon fundamental ontological, epistemological, and moral philosophical implications. We distinguish a skeptical individualist, an aggregationist, and an entity view of collectivity, as well as a formal, linear, a subjective, existential-narrative, and a socio-cultural understanding of temporality. The combination of these dimensions allows the development of a systematic matrix of conceptions of generations and intergenerational relations in healthcare ethics whose analytical potential we illustrate with regard to three paradigmatic examples. We provide a systematic summary of our considerations and outline a research agenda that addresses desiderata for intergenerational perspectives in healthcare ethics, encompassing clinical ethics, research ethics, and public health ethics, as well as meta-ethical questions.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareIntergenerational RelationsHumansMoralsPhilosophy, MedicalCollectivityFutureGenerationHealthcare ethicsIntergenerational bioethicsMedical ethicsTemporalityTime

Identifiers

PMID41396336
PMCPMC12960384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.