ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Mapping the growth of robotic neurosurgery research: Insights from more than 5,000 publications and 100 top-cited papers.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From feasibility to consolidation: a bibliometric analysis of robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (2011-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This bibliometric analysis mapped global research activity in robotic neurosurgery using the Scopus database. A comprehensive search string combining multiple synonyms for robotics and neurosurgery was applied across three search fields. The title–abstract–keywords (TAK) search retrieved 5196 documents, the abstract-only 1998, and the title-only 432, spanning 1982–2025. Publication activity rose sharply after 2011, accounting for 85.8%, 89.3%, and 90.0% of all records, respectively. In the TAK category, Tian, W. led with 37 publications, followed by Theodore, N. (34), Roberts, D.W. (29), Siewerdsen, J.H. (27), and Marcus, H.J. (26). Leading institutions included Harvard Medical School (100), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (77), University of Toronto (75), and Chinese Academy of Sciences (74). By country, the United States (1906) and China (839) dominated output. Major funding sources were the National Natural Science Foundation of China (341) and the U.S. National Institutes of Health (224). The top journals were World Neurosurgery (307), International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (143), and International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery (114). The 100 most cited documents (1987–2023) originated from 53 sources, comprising 71 original articles and 29 reviews, with a mean of 81.37 citations per paper. Co-word dynamics (1993–2023) traced the evolution from early systems like Minerva and Pathfinder to validated spinal and brain stimulation robots. Focus shifted from image-guided and telemanipulated systems to robot-assisted spine surgery and deep brain stimulation, and later to augmented reality, autonomous navigation, and AI-based robotics. Thematic clustering indicated convergence of robotic guidance, MRI-compatible tools, and minimally invasive surgery, marking the field’s transition from feasibility testing to precision-driven clinical application. Additionally, manual review of the 25 most cited documents provided contextualized summaries of their primary themes and research emphasis, guided by citation impact and content relevance. Collectively, these findings highlight a rapidly expanding, technologically evolving field with growing clinical translation and interdisciplinary integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.