SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
Timing of orchidopexy and effect on surrogate outcomes for fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCryptorchidism is a common congenital abnormality affecting male infants and is associated with impaired germ cell maturation and infertility. Current guidelines recommend orchidopexy between 6 and 18 months of age to optimize fertility-related outcomes; however, the real-world feasibility of early surgery is limited, and the benefits of earlier intervention remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether orchidopexy before 12 months reduces testicular atrophy and postoperative complications compared with surgery after 12 months.
methodsA systematic literature search of five databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing early (< 12 months) versus late orchidopexy in boys with cryptorchidism were included, based on thresholds within the available data. The primary outcome was testicular atrophy; secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and fertility-related markers. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed with outcomes reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.
resultsSixteen studies were included. Meta-analysis of 1855 testes from five studies showed no significant difference in testicular atrophy between orchidopexy before 12 months (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.49–2.23; I² = 0%). Pooled analysis of 757 testes across three studies showed no significant difference in postoperative complication rates (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.44–2.99; I² = 36%). The overall quality of evidence was rated low for both outcomes.
conclusionAvailable data of low quality suggest that orchidopexy before 12 months does not significantly reduce testicular atrophy or postoperative complications compared with later surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.