Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396319›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2025

Ovarian salvage following adnexal torsion in pediatric patients.

Andrew Mudreac, Spencer E Kim, Rosa Hwang, Peter Mattei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew MudreacDivision of General, Thoracic, and Fetal Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Spencer E KimPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rosa HwangDivision of General, Thoracic, and Fetal Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Peter MatteiDivision of General, Thoracic, and Fetal Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn 2017, the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) published a systematic review that supported ovarian detorsion rather than oophorectomy for children with ovarian torsion. We evaluated our institutional ovarian salvage rate and outcomes following ovarian detorsion before and after publication of these APSA recommendations.

methodsElectronic Medical Record data for patients who underwent operative intervention for adnexal torsion and between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2023 at a single pediatric center were reviewed. Patients with antenatal torsion were excluded. Patient characteristics, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were examined.

resultsA total of 238 patients were included. Mean age was 10.9 years (range 0.1-20.0). Mean time from presentation to OR was 9.5 h (SD 8.9). Ovarian detorsion was performed in 186 patients (78.2%). Oophorectomy was performed in 52 (21.8%); of these, 33 (63.5%) demonstrated evidence of necrosis and 14 (26.9%) were associated with a tumor. There were no intraoperative complications. There were no thromboembolic events following detorsion. Pregnancy data were available for 10 patients, with 7 live births.

conclusionOvarian salvage is the preferred treatment for torsion. Our rates of ovarian salvage have improved over the past 10 years with no negative sequelae and no missed malignancies.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesOvarian TorsionOvariectomyOvaryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultOophorectomyOrgan sparing treatmentOvarian torsionPediatrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.