SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Progressive scoliosis in a pediatric patient with cerebellar ataxia: surgical challenges and literature review.
Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) and Friedreich's ataxia (FA) frequently give rise to progressive scoliosis, which impairs respiratory and postural function. Although spinal fusion is the most reliable method for correcting deformities, perioperative neurological vulnerability and monitoring failures complicate decision-making. This study combines a systematic review with a detailed pediatric case to clarify current evidence on surgical management, complications, and outcomes.
methodsWe present a 12-year-old girl who underwent posterior fusion (T4-L4) for presumed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Early proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) prompted planned revision, which was terminated after the intraoperative loss of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). Subsequent imaging revealed cerebellar atrophy consistent with SCA. Definitive surgery extended the construct to T2 and incorporated a T4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Persistent gait and balance deficits were managed with intensive rehabilitation. In parallel, a PRISMA-compliant systematic search of PubMed and Embase (2000-May 2025) identified pediatric studies reporting scoliosis surgery in SCA or FA. Four studies (105 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for surgical strategy, neuromonitoring performance, and complications.
resultsIn the index case, the unreliability of the SSEP necessitated staged correction; transient unilateral lower limb weakness resolved partially over 6 months. A literature synthesis revealed PJK in 23-25% of patients and high SSEP failure rates (up to 91%); nevertheless, no permanent neurological injuries were reported. Infection (≤ 4%) and pseudarthrosis were infrequent, whereas one cardiopulmonary death occurred. Motor evoked potential (MEP) is seldom employed but may offer greater sensitivity. Disease severity, rather than surgical variables alone, influences long-term functional outcomes.
conclusionsSpinal fusion can be performed safely in pediatric SCA/FA patients when meticulous multidisciplinary planning, individualized neuromonitoring strategies, and aggressive postoperative rehabilitation are adopted. Early recognition of underlying ataxia is critical for risk stratification and the timing of intervention. Prospective, longitudinal studies are warranted to refine guidelines and optimize neurological and orthopedic results in this complex population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.