SynthesisAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026
Foley catheter balloon tamponade for actively bleeding wounds following penetrating neck injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Minimally Invasive Salvage Technique for One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Leaks: A Preliminary Case Series.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter balloon tamponade (FCBT) for actively bleeding penetrating neck injuries (PNI), focusing on rates of haemostatic success, subsequent surgical exploration, morbidity and mortality associated with FCBT in PNI.
methodsA systematic search of Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library was conducted to 29 May 2025. Observational studies reporting FCBT outcomes in actively bleeding PNI were included. Pooled proportions were calculated with random effects models using Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation; heterogeneity was explored with subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.
findingsNine studies (1,658 participants) were included. FCBT was deployed in 236 cases, yielding a pooled rate of use of 27.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27 to 64.60,
conclusionsFCBT is a simple, rapid technique that achieves temporary haemorrhage control in PNI, providing a bridge to definitive surgical control, and may be effective as definitive treatment in selected venous injuries. However, pooled data are limited by heterogeneity in catheter size, balloon inflation and dwell time, restricting interpretability. Standardised multicentre prospective studies are needed to refine indications, optimise technique, and quantify complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.