ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Constrained acetabular liners in the instability of hip arthroplasty: what is its current role in revision surgery?
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDislocation of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly disabling complication following the implantation of primary and revision hip arthroplasties, as well as a prevalent reason for subsequent revisions. This study is designed to evaluate the survival rate, functional outcomes, and the reasons for further revision due to implant failure of Constrained Acetabular Liners (CALs).
methods56 patients underwent hip revision surgery using a Constrained Acetabular Liner between June 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria consisted of age > 18 years, follow-up of at least 12 months, prior total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty, a history of recurrent implant dislocation, or, alternatively, the presence of a high risk of implant instability in hip revisions due to mechanical conditions.
resultsThe average age at the time of surgery was 72.4 years (SD 12.4). 55.6% of implants were performed for recurrent dislocation of THA, 8.9% for recurrent dislocation of bipolar hemiarthroplasty, 13.3% for aseptic loosening revisions, 4.4% for adverse reactions to metal debris revision procedures, and 17.8% for two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection. The average follow-up at the final evaluation was 32 months (SD 12.3). The survivorship of the implant was 88.9% at final follow-up. At the final follow-up: average HHS 77.4 ± 13.2; average WOMAC 31.4 ± 13.4; average OHS 32.1 ± 6.9; and average FJS-12 69.5 ± 19.6., and 65% showed excellent or good outcomes (HHS > 80).
conclusionsThe CALs assessed in this study have shown satisfactory functional outcomes, even when compared with other anti-dislocation systems available on the market. Both cemented and uncemented solutions have shown a good survival rate in the mid-term. However, their use should be reserved for selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.