Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396177›Full record

ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026

Mentors and Minds: Exploring Feedback of Students and Teachers on Elective Postings under Competency-based Medical Education Curriculum.

Vatsala Godara, Praveen Kulkarni, M Rakesh, Annaram Ravali, K Pushpalatha, D Sunil Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vatsala GodaraDepartment of Community Medicine, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Praveen KulkarniDepartment of Community Medicine, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
M RakeshDepartment of Community Medicine, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Annaram RavaliDepartment of Community Medicine, Arundhati Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
K PushpalathaDepartment of Anatomy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
D Sunil KumarDepartment of Community Medicine, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, JSS Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2019, India shifted to competency-based medical education (CBME). This reform allows MBBS students to select electives in basic sciences, clinical programs, and research domains under the Graduate Medical Education Regulations 2019. Electives deepen learning through communicative and instrumental phases, contrasting with mandatory core courses. AIM AND

objectivesTo identify the perceptions of students and teachers regarding the newly introduced electives under the CBME curriculum. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted for a 2-month duration among MBBS medical students following the CBME curriculum, particularly the 2019-2020 batch and teachers assigned for different electives in JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru. A total of 197 students underwent elective posting for 1 month. Data were collected using a structured digital self-administered questionnaire designed separately for the students and the coordinators.

resultsOut of 197 students and 36 teachers, 65.4% (129) in Block 1 and 57.3% (113) in Block 2 felt the duration of elective postings was sufficient. The majority of the students expressed that one more month should have been extended for elective postings. Among the teachers, 38.8% in Block 1 and 33.3% (12) in Block 2 felt the duration of elective postings was sufficient. Regarding the effectiveness of elective postings in evoking students' interest in the subject, the majority, i.e., 49.4% agreed, whereas 19.4% expressed neutral opinion.

conclusionsIn the present study, the majority of the students and faculty expressed positive responses about the selection process, implementation, utility, and effectiveness of the electives in the MBBS program.

Indexed as

Competency-Based EducationCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFaculty, MedicalMentorsStudents, MedicalAdultClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesFeedbackFemaleHumansIndiaMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCompetency-based medical education curriculumelectivesÉtudiants en MBBSfeedbackMBBS studentsprogramme d’enseignement médical axé sur les compétencesrétroactionstages optionnels

Identifiers

PMID41396177
PMCPMC13645261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.