Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396103›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2026

12-Month Outcomes From a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Evaluating a Novel Prostatic Urethral Stent for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Steven A Kaplan, Sijo J Parekattil, Ning Z Wu, Brian Mazzarella, Michael Trotter, Sheldon Freedman, Samuel Lawindy, Raviender Bukkapatnam, Bradley F Schwartz, Barry Jones and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05186740 (The ProVee Urethral Expander System Clinical Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05186740 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The ProVee Urethral Expander System Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorProVerum MedicalRan2022 to 2028Enrolled221ConditionsBPH With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsArmsProVee Urethral Expander System, Urethral Access Sheath
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Steven A KaplanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2558-7306
Sijo J ParekattilAvant Concierge Urology, Winter Garden, Florida.
Ning Z WuComprehensive Urologic Care, Lake Barrington, Illinois.
Brian MazzarellaUrology Austin, Austin, Texas.
Michael TrotterMidtown Urology Associates, Austin, Texas.
Sheldon FreedmanFreedman Urology, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Samuel LawindyAdvanced Urology Institute, Daytona Beach, Florida.
Raviender BukkapatnamFlorida Urology Partners, Tampa, Florida.
Bradley F SchwartzSIU Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.
Barry JonesSt James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Prithipal SethiGolden State Urology, Stockton, California.
Mark JalkutAssociated Urologists of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina.
John S LiuUrology of Virginia, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Dean EltermanDivision of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Edward GheilerUrology Specialist Group, Miami, Florida.
Ricardo R GonzalezHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Jed KaminetskyAdvanced Urology Centers of New York, New York, New York.
Jay A MotolaNYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Alexis TeIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Christopher ChappleSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Lori LernerBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Thomas LynchSt James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe ProVee System for benign prostatic hyperplasia is a new generation permanent prostatic urethral stent for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. ProVIDE is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of ProVee against a sham procedure. MATERIALS AND

methodsMen at least aged 45 years were eligible for the study if they had International Prostate Symptom Score ≥ 13, peak urinary flow rate < 12 mL/s, prostate volume 30 to 80 cc, and prostatic urethral length ≥3.75 cm. Primary effectiveness endpoints were a mean improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score at 3 months and 12 months. Symptomatic improvement, uroflowmetry, quality of life, and sexual function were assessed at follow-up.

resultsA total of 221 participants were randomized 2:1 (150 ProVee, 71 sham) at 15 centers in the United States and 2 centers outside the United States. Treatments were performed in an ambulatory surgery center or office setting and required no catheterization postprocedure. Intention-to-treat analyses showed a > 25% mean improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score over sham at 3 months (9.5 vs 5.6,

conclusionsTreatment with ProVee was reliably performed and resulted in a statistically superior improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score at 3 months compared with a sham procedure with sustained response at 12 months. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05186740.

Indexed as

lower urinary tract symptomsminimally invasive surgical proceduresprostatic hyperplasiastents

Identifiers

PMID41396103
PMCPMC12978722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.