ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Method for analyzing the clinical applicability of a terminology subset in primary health care: theoretical study.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Applicability of a Terminology Subset for Monitoring Child Development from Zero Months to Age Three: An Observational Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo detail the stages of the method for analyzing the clinical applicability of terminological subsets in the context of Primary Health Care.
methodA theoretical- reflective study that presents three prerequisites and four stages of the method for analyzing the clinical applicability of terminological subsets, based on reflection on two operationalization experiences.
resultsThe prerequisites are related to the choice of the research setting, the selection of participants-clients and nurses, with an emphasis on inclusion criteria-and prior knowledge of the terminology and theoretical model. The steps of the method are: development of the data collection instrument, according to the steps of the Nursing Process and the categories of the theoretical model; systematic and participatory observation of the nursing consultation; evaluation of the return consultation at the health unit or at home; organization and analysis of data, in a descriptive manner and according to the theoretical model. In addition, a case study example can be developed. Final considerations: The method presented can be replicated in Primary Health Care settings, so that it can be critiqued, adjusted, and reorganized. It is understood that the method is a tool for analyzing praxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.