ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Nursing care for users with post-COVID conditions in primary and specialized health care.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze and compare the nursing care provided to users with Post-COVID Conditions (PCC) in Primary Health Care (PHC) and Specialized Care (SC).
methodThis is an analytical cross-sectional study carried out with 226 nursing professionals from PHC and SC in Brazil. Data were collected through a self-responding form published by the Nursing Councils and on social media and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, followed by the t-test to compare means and chi-square tests to study associations with categorical data. The study was approved by the UFSCar Research Ethics Committee.
resultsAn association between PHC nursing professionals and the identification of persistent cough as the most common symptom of PCC (80.2% vs 50%; p< 0.01) and neurocognitive deficit as the most severe symptom (62% vs 42.1%; p = 0.04); and an association between SC professionals and the identification of loss of appetite as the least common symptom of PCC (43.7% vs 22%; p = 0.02).
conclusionThe results highlight challenges such as the difficulty in identifying PCC, the absence of widely used protocols, and the limited training of PHC and SC nursing professionals, impacting the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.