ArticleChemical senses2025
Diversity in chemosensory receptor genes in dogs and wolves: degeneration of the olfactory receptor gene repertoire in the brachycephalic Pug.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Canine "Sniffin' Sticks" enable behavioural olfactometry to complement neurological examination in dogs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dogs, domesticated from gray wolves over 15,000 yr ago, exhibit extensive variation among breeds, including differences in olfactory ability. To investigate the genetic basis of these differences, we analyzed single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in 3 chemosensory receptor gene families-olfactory receptors (ORs), vomeronasal receptors type 1 (V1Rs), and bitter taste receptors (T2Rs)-using whole-genome data from the Dog Biomedical Variant Database Consortium, which includes 635 domestic dogs representing 121 breeds and 8 wolves. We identified 179 segregating pseudogenes in OR genes (minor allele frequency > 1%), including cases where intact genes are pseudogenized in some individuals and vice versa. The number of functional OR genes varied substantially among individuals (779 to 807), while V1R and T2R gene counts were nearly invariant (8 and 16, respectively). Compared to wolves, dogs exhibited significantly higher ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous SNVs (N/S) in OR and T2R genes, suggesting relaxed functional constraints potentially associated with domestication. Among breeds, Pugs had significantly fewer functional OR genes and a higher N/S ratio than other breeds, even after accounting for copy number variation. Notably, an OR gene orthologous to the human androstenone receptor, OR7D4, was completely pseudogenized in all Pugs but remained largely functional in other breeds. These findings support the hypothesis that reduced olfactory ability in brachycephalic breeds, such as Pugs, is associated with genetic degeneration of OR genes. Overall, our study provides new insights into the genetic diversity of chemosensory receptor repertoires in dogs and underscores the impact of domestication and breed-specific morphological traits on olfactory function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.