ReviewChemical senses2025
Receptors and signaling for sour and salty: the ionic taste qualities.
Review in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bidirectional influences and clinical implications of psychological factors and oral health during orthodontic treatment.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review outlines the specific ion channels, taste cell types, downstream signaling, and neural transmission mechanisms involved in the perception of sour and salty tastes. Both of these taste qualities arise from ionic stimuli and so can be detected via ion channels rather than G protein-coupled receptors. Sour taste, triggered by protons in acidic substances such as lemon juice and vinegar, is mediated within taste buds exclusively by type III taste cells. Protons enter the receptor cell through the apically located proton-selective channel OTOP1, thereby directly depolarizing the taste cell and reducing intracellular pH, which may block K+ channels to further amplify the response. Type III cells then release serotonin (5-HT) via conventional chemical synapses to activate nerve fibers. Salt taste involves both type II and type III cells. In a subset of type II cells, low NaCl concentrations, which are appetitive, pass through the apically located, sodium-selective, and amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel. In response, these cells generate action potentials and release ATP through the CALHM1/3 "channel synapse" to stimulate gustatory afferents. High concentrations of NaCl, KCl, and NH4Cl, which are aversive, are detected by a different subset of type II cells and type III cells. Although the depolarizing mechanism for high concentrations of NaCl and KCl remains unidentified, NH4CL is detected by OTOP1 in type III taste receptor cells, and the chloride channel TMC4 may contribute to repolarization of the receptor cells, to enhance their responsivity to the salt stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.