ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026
Dental crown morphological variation and heterodonty in carcharhiniform sharks.
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tooth morphology of deep-water catsharks of the genus Apristurus (Chondrichthyes: Pentanchidae) in the North Atlantic Ocean.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elasmobranch teeth are highly mineralized structures that constitute the majority of the fossil record for this group. Despite their taxonomic and evolutionary significance, detailed descriptions of dental morphology remain scarce. The order Carcharhiniformes, the most diverse among sharks, comprises 304 valid species that display remarkable diversity and complexity in dentition. This study aims to describe and illustrate crown morphological variation within Carcharhiniformes, with a focus on family-level patterns and types of heterodonty. Tooth samples were obtained from specimens preserved in 70% ethanol and from dry jaws. A total of 66 samples, representing all families except Dichichthyidae, were examined and photographed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The types of heterodonty considered include dignathic, gynandric, monognathic, and ontogenetic. Dignathic and monognathic heterodonty were further classified as weak, moderate, and strong. Four sub-arrangements were recognized: imbricate, independent, mixed, and overlap, as well as the pavement and independent dentition arrangements. New data reveal previously unrecognized patterns of variation across the four types of heterodonty in Carcharhinidae, Scyliorhinidae, Proscylliidae, Triakidae, and Pentanchidae. High-resolution SEM images allowed detailed characterization of crown morphology, highlighting subtle diagnostic features and family-level differences across heterodonty types. Dental complexity in Carcharhiniformes is largely driven by the distribution and combination of heterodonty types. These detailed dental descriptions provide a valuable framework for understanding the diversity and evolutionary significance of dentition within the most diverse order of sharks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.