ArticleMedical physics2025
A physics-informed deep learning model for MRI brain motion correction.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Brain MRI Artifact Correction: Current Challenges and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Res-MoCoDiff: residual-guided diffusion models for motion artifact correction in brain MRI.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of AI-driven MRI Motion Artifact Detection and Correction.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Res-MoCoDiff: Residual-guided diffusion models for motion artifact correction in brain MRI.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential brain imaging tool, but its long acquisition times make it highly susceptible to motion artifacts that can degrade diagnostic quality. PURPOSE: This work aims to develop and evaluate a novel physics-informed motion correction network, termed PI-MoCoNet, which leverages complementary information from both the spatial and k-space domains. The primary goal is to robustly remove motion artifacts from high-resolution brain MRI images without explicit motion parameter estimation, thereby preserving image fidelity and enhancing diagnostic reliability. MATERIALS AND
methodsPI-MoCoNet is designed as a dual-network framework consisting of a motion detection network and a motion correction network. The motion detection network employs a U-net architecture to identify corrupted k-space lines using a spatial averaging module, thereby reducing prediction uncertainty. The correction network, inspired by recent advances in U-net architectures and incorporating Swin Transformer blocks, reconstructs motion-corrected images by leveraging three loss components: the reconstruction loss (
resultsPI-MoCoNet demonstrated significant improvements over competing methods across all levels of motion artifacts. On the IXI dataset, for minor motion artifacts, PSNR improved from 34.15 dB in the motion-corrupted images to 45.95 dB after correction, SSIM increased from 0.87 to 1.00, and NMSE was reduced from 0.55% to 0.04%. For moderate artifacts, PSNR increased from 30.23 to 42.16 dB, SSIM from 0.80 to 0.99, and NMSE from 1.32% to 0.09%. In the case of heavy artifacts, PSNR improved from 27.99 to 36.01 dB, SSIM from 0.75 to 0.97, and NMSE decreased from 2.21% to 0.36%. On the MR-ART dataset, PSNR values increased from 23.15 to 33.01 dB for low artifact levels and from 21.23 to 31.72 dB for high artifact levels; concurrently, SSIM improved from 0.72 to 0.87 and from 0.63 to 0.83, while NMSE decreased from 10.08% to 6.24% and from 14.77% to 8.32%, respectively. An ablation study further confirmed that incorporating both data consistency and perceptual losses led to an approximate 1 dB gain in PSNR and a reduction of 0.17% in NMSE compared to using the reconstruction loss alone.
conclusionsPI-MoCoNet is a robust, physics-informed framework for mitigating brain motion artifacts in MRI. By successfully integrating spatial and k-space information, it enhances image quality and reduces the likelihood of repeat imaging sessions due to motion-induced degradation. Its superior performance compared to existing methods underscores its clinical applicability, especially in scenarios where patient motion is inevitable, thus improving patient comfort, diagnostic reliability, and overall treatment planning efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41395855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.