ArticleGut microbes2025
Supplementation with endogenous healthy gut metabolites reverses the disruptions of in vitro and ex vivo epithelial functions induced by fecal content from IBD patients.
Article in Gut microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of gut microbiota on chronic lymphocytic leukemia development and aggressiveness.Gut microbes reports · 2027Article
- Human gut microbiome as a composite health biomarker.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- From Multi-Omics to Molecular Causality: A Five-Tier Evidence Framework for the Single-Bacterium-Metabolite Axis in IBD.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite epithelial involvement in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis and the gaps in treatment goals with existing immune-directed therapy, epithelial-directed interventions are unavailable. Using patient-based models, we aimed to identify bioactive endogenous metabolites that can improve IBD epithelial dysfunction, are generally regarded as safe, and can enhance epithelial homeostasis. We pooled fecal material from subjects with and without IBD to capture patient heterogeneity and analyzed the fecal contents for microbiome composition and metabolomics. Epithelial cells (Caco-2 cells and patient-derived colonoids) were cultured, and fecal material was applied apically to replicate the gut's physiological orientation. Measurable epithelial outputs included epithelial proinflammatory signals, integrity, and cellular ATP levels. We show that fecal content pools from several independent IBD patients disturb epithelial functions significantly more than does the fecal content from controls. Improved epithelial readouts in the functional patient-based models were linked with several gut metabolite levels, and these findings were further validated in an independent published human biospecimen multi-omics in vivo cohort. This guided the supplementation of five prioritized metabolites (azelate, pyridoxal, fructose-6-phosphate, galactose 1-phosphate, and ribose 5-phosphate) into the IBD fecal content, which reversed the related IBD epithelial dysfunction. We streamline a proof-of-concept pipeline for the prioritization of epithelial-targeted metabolite interventions that can direct safe future novel adjunct interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.