ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2025
Voice-based prediction of prediabetes using classical machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in prediabetes care: applications in screening, risk prediction, and lifestyle intervention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Non-Glycemic Clinical Data for Type 2 Diabetes Detection in Mexican Adults: A Comparative Analysis of Atherogenic Indices, Statistical Transformations, and Machine Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prediabetes is a highly prevalent metabolic condition that significantly increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Despite its clinical importance, over 80% of individuals with prediabetes remain undiagnosed. Voice analysis has emerged as a non-invasive, accessible method for disease screening, with prior work showing promising results in detecting hypertension and type 2 diabetes from acoustic features. This study investigates whether voice-based machine learning models can identify individuals with prediabetes and evaluates the generalizability of these models across populations. Methods: Participants were recruited from clinical sites in India and a community college in Canada. All participants recorded the same spoken phrase multiple times daily via a mobile app, and glycemic status was assessed using HbA1c levels. Voice recordings were preprocessed to remove silence and trimmed to exclude potentially uninformative sections. A total of 167 acoustic features were extracted from each sample using Librosa, scipy, and parselmouth. Features were averaged per participant. Sex-specific models were developed under six experimental configurations varying by dataset balance (age/BMI-matched vs. unbalanced) and BMI inclusion. Feature selection was conducted using L1-regularized logistic regression (LASSO), and SMOTE was applied during training to address class imbalance. Twelve machine learning classifiers were evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation (LOSO-CV) on the India dataset. Final models were tested on a holdout India subset and the independent Canada dataset. Results: In cross-validation, the best female model (XGBoost, balanced, no BMI) achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.78, and the best male model (Random Forest, balanced, no BMI) achieved 0.68. However, holdout set testing identified different optimal configurations for generalization: the male XGBoost model trained on an unbalanced dataset outperformed the cross-validated model. In the Canada dataset, models failed to generalize effectively, with several configurations unable to correctly identify prediabetic participants. Discussion: Voice-based prediction models show potential for prediabetes screening in controlled populations, but their performance declines when applied across geographic or demographic boundaries. These findings highlight the need for more diverse training data and population-specific model tuning to support real-world applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.