SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025
Advances in machine and deep learning for ECG beat classification: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Battery-aware approximate wireless telemetry framework for resilient wearable ECG monitoring under extreme power constraints.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in the Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram by Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A three-level risk stratification algorithm for arrhythmia based on CNN-LSTM palindromic structure.BioData mining · 2026Article
- CaReS-BiNet: A multi-scale deep learning framework for ECG arrhythmia classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Biosignals to Bedside: A Review of Real-Time Edge Machine Learning for Wearable Health Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Explainable hybrid deep learning framework with Grad-CAM for heartbeat-level arrhythmia classification.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an important tool for exploring the structure and function of the heart due to its low cost, ease of use, efficiency, and non-invasive nature. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field, ECG beat classification has emerged as a key area of research for performing accurate, automated, and interpretable cardiac analysis. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria, we examined a total of 106 relevant articles published between 2014 and 2024. This study investigates ECG signal analysis to identify and categorize various beats with better accuracy and efficiency, by emphasizing and applying vital pre-processing techniques for denoising the raw data. Particular attention is given to the evolution from traditional feature-engineering methods toward advanced architectures with automated feature extraction and classification, such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and hybrid frameworks with attention mechanisms. In addition, this review article investigates the common challenges observed in the existing studies, including data imbalance, inter-patient variability, and the absence of unified evaluation metrics, which restrict fair comparison and clinical translation. To address these gaps, future research directions are proposed, focusing on the development of standardized multi-center datasets, cross-modal fusion of physiological signals, and interpretable AI models to facilitate real-world deployment in healthcare systems. This systematic review provides a structured overview of the current state and emerging trends in ECG beat classification, offering clear insights for researchers and clinicians to guide future advancements in intelligent cardiac diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.