ArticleInternational cancer conference journal2025
Early detection of drug-induced interstitial lung disease using an electronic patient-reported outcome system: a report of two cases.
Article in International cancer conference journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DILD) is an adverse event associated with the use of various anticancer drugs. Although DILD is rare, it is a serious complication that can lead to treatment interruption and, in some cases, life-threatening outcomes. The early detection of DILD requires careful monitoring of subjective symptoms, regular computed tomography (CT) scans, and biomarker assessments. We present two cases in which electronic patient-reported monitoring by a pharmacist, utilizing an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) application, enabled the early detection of DILD in patients with breast cancer undergoing anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy and treatment for recurrence with everolimus (EVL) and exemestane (EXE). In the first case, a woman in her 50 s with early stage breast cancer received dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) therapy as adjuvant treatment following surgery. On day 14 of the second cycle, the ePRO flagged cough and fever symptoms. The following day, the patient's fever subsided, and chest X-rays showed no abnormal findings. The third cycle of dose-dense EC therapy was discontinued, and the patient was followed up. Monitoring with ePROs was continued, and on day 18, the patient developed a fever again and experienced worsening dyspnea, prompting a medical consultation. Chest CT confirmed the diagnosis of DILD, and steroid pulse therapy was initiated. In the second case, a woman in her 60 s with recurrent breast cancer underwent EVL + EXE. Between days 86 and 89, ePROs identified fever, fatigue, and cough, prompting the patient to consult a physician. A chest CT scan revealed grade 1 DILD, which led to the discontinuation of EVL therapy. These cases suggest that the application of ePRO is valuable for the early detection of DILD, potentially improving patient outcomes by allowing timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.