ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The genus Methods: In this work, we isolated strain BMH-0061 as a root endophyte of chili ( Results: Integrative phylogenomic analyses, supported by Bayesian speciation models and clustering-based comparisons, consistently recovered BMH-0061 as an independent lineage. The strain exhibited broad-spectrum mycoparasitism against phytopathogens and tolerance to moderate abiotic stress. Morphological characterization, growth profiles, and multi-gene phylogenies suggested its placement within the Discussion: We formally describe this new taxon as Trichoderma tlahuicanensis sp. nov., in honor of the indigenous pre-Hispanic Tlahuica people of Morelos, Mexico. Our work demonstrates how a phylophenetic framework, combining genomic, phylogenetic, genetic diversity, and evolutionary analyses, provides a powerful approach to species delimitation. This integrative strategy confirms the recognition of T. tlahuicanensis as a distinct species while offering a methodological pathway for peers engaged in fungal systematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.