Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41395368›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Statistical and machine learning approaches for identifying biomarker associations in respiratory diseases in a population-specific region.

Meshari Alazmi, Amer AlGhadhban, Abdulaziz Almalaq, Kamaleldin B Said, Yazeed Faden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meshari AlazmiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Amer AlGhadhbanMedical and Diagnostic Research Center, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlmalaqMedical and Diagnostic Research Center, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Kamaleldin B SaidMedical and Diagnostic Research Center, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Yazeed FadenFaculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing interest in utilizing clinical blood biomarkers for non-invasive diagnostics has transformed the approach to early detection and prognosis of respiratory diseases. Biomarker-driven diagnostics offer cost-effective, rapid, and scalable alternatives to traditional imaging and clinical assessments. In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 913 patients from a local respiratory clinic in Hail region, evaluating the diagnostic relevance of 15 blood biomarkers across four respiratory conditions: COVID-19, pneumonia, asthma, and other complications. Through data-driven analysis, statistical correlation assessments, and machine learning classification models (decision tree classifiers), we identified significant biomarker interactions that contributed to disease differentiation. Notably, CRP and HGB demonstrated a strong negative correlation (-55%), supporting the well-established role of systemic inflammation in anemia of chronic disease. Additionally, Ferritin and LDH exhibited a positive correlation (+50%), indicating metabolic stress and cellular injury in severe respiratory illnesses. Other significant correlations included Creatinine and ESR being negatively associated with RBC, while GGT and ALT were positively correlated (+49%). Additionally, bilirubin and HGB were positively correlated (+49%), collectively reflecting systemic inflammatory and metabolic responses associated with respiratory pathology. The machine learning model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with the following performance metrics: COVID-19: Precision (0.94), Recall (0.96), F1-score (0.95). Pneumonia: Precision (0.97), Recall (0.71), F1-score (0.85). Asthma: Precision (1.00), Recall (0.95), F1-score (0.97). Other Complications: Precision (0.88), Recall (0.90), F1-score (0.90). These findings validate the diagnostic potential of biomarker panels in respiratory disease classification, offering a novel approach to integrating statistical and computational modeling for clinical decision-making. By leveraging biomarker relationships and machine learning algorithms, this study contributes to the development of personalized, non-invasive, and cost-effective diagnostic tools for respiratory diseases, ultimately improving patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Indexed as

biomarkersclinical data analysisCOVID-19decision treemachine learningnon-invasive diagnosticspulmonologyrespiratory diseases

Identifiers

PMID41395368
PMCPMC12696709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.