ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2025
Efficacy of continuing pembrolizumab after progression on first-line treatment in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective real-world study.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective observational study investigated the efficacy of pembrolizumab administered as first-line therapy and the survival outcomes of continuing or combining it with other agents after disease progression in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 63 patients who experienced disease progression following pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment between February 2019 and July 2024 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were randomized into two cohorts based on treatment strategy: a treated beyond progression (TBP) group (n = 39) to receive continued pembrolizumab monotherapy or pembrolizumab-based combination regimens after disease progression, and a non-TBP (NTBP) group (n = 24), which discontinued pembrolizumab upon progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The median PFS during first-line therapy (mPFS1) was 6.97 months. In the TBP group, the median PFS from first-line initiation to progression after second-line therapy (mPFS2) was 17.6 months, with an ORR of 20.5% and a DCR of 74.4%. OS in the TBP group was significantly longer than that in NTBP group (29.4 vs. 12.4 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified continued pembrolizumab use and favorable ECOG performance status as independent predictors of prolonged OS. These findings suggest that continued pembrolizumab use or combination therapy after disease progression significantly enhances survival benefits in advanced NSCLC, underscoring the importance of individualized treatment strategies based on clinical characteristics and treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.