ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2025
Identification and Phylodynamic Analysis of the Siberian Subtype of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Tick-Bitten Patients From Northeastern China.
Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and Phylodynamic Analysis of the Siberian Subtype of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus in Tick-Bitten Patients From Northeastern China.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Far Eastern (FE) tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) was thought to be the only endemic subtype in northeastern China. However, in 2024, the Siberian (Sib) subtype of TBEV was found in ticks. This study investigates Sib-TBEV infection in tick-bitten patients in the region. A total of 2573 tick-bitten patients, including 506 inpatients and 2067 outpatients, were enrolled between April and September in both 2023 and 2024 and were tested for Sib-TBEV using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Seven cases were confirmed, with four among inpatients and three among outpatients. All four inpatients exhibited headaches and had hospital stays ranging from 5 to 21 days. Two inpatients with longer hospital stays showed additional symptoms: one experienced dizziness and fatigue, while the other exhibited liver injury and neurological symptoms, including facial paralysis, dysarthria, and meningeal signs. All patients recovered and were discharged without sequelae. Seven Sib-TBEV complete genomes were amplified and classified into the Sib-TBEV Zausaev and Vasilchenko lineages. Bayesian analysis estimated that the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) of these strains dates to a period between 1898 and 1983, with possible migration pathways from Irkutsk or Zabaykalsky to the Daxing'an Mountains (DXAM) in northeastern China. We identified Sib-TBEV-infected patients in northeastern China and characterized their epidemiological and clinical features. Sib-TBEV may have been circulating in northeastern China for decades, underscoring the need for TBEV surveillance in ticks, animals, and tick-bitten patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.