ReviewJournal of management2026
All the Lonely People: An Integrated Review and Research Agenda on Work and Loneliness.
Review in Journal of management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of physical activity on self-esteem in older adults: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of a mindfulness-based intervention versus a social contact control in alleviating loneliness among older adults: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ mental health · 2026Trial
- Lonely at Work: The Moderating Role of Leader-Member Exchange in the Association Between Workplace Loneliness and Perceived Task and Contextual Performance.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of brief scales for loneliness at work in Korea: the Three-Item Scale for Loneliness at Work (SLAW-3) and Single-Item Scale for Loneliness at Work (SLAW-1).Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Loneliness Biases Social Engagement Decisions: Evidence From Value-Based Choice Models.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- From loneliness to connection: the formation mechanism of loneliness, job search stress, and organizational belonging among students approaching graduation in a context of employment contraction.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Employed cancer survivors develop a peer-support intervention to improve social connections: a participatory design study.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- A Preliminary Examination of Reward Processing and Loneliness in Cigarette Smokers.Substance use & misuse · 2026Article
- Workplace loneliness and the communication climate of healthcare workers: the moderating role of perceived social competence.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- When Loneliness Leads to Help-Seeking: The Role of Perceived Transactive Memory System and Work Meaningfulness.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The influence of workplace stressors on negative attitudes toward long-term male parental leave: a cross-sectional study in Japan.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decades of studies spanning multiple disciplines have provided insight into the critical role of loneliness in work contexts. In spite of this extensive research, a comprehensive review of loneliness and work remains absent. To address this gap, we conducted a multidisciplinary review of relevant theory and research and identified 213 articles reporting on 233 empirical studies from management, organizational psychology, sociology, medicine, and other domains to uncover why people feel lonely, how different features of work can contribute to feelings of loneliness, and the implications of employee loneliness for organizational settings. This enabled a critical examination of the distinct conceptualizations and operationalizations of loneliness that have been advanced and the theories underpinning this scholarship. We developed a comprehensive conceptual model that integrates cognitive discrepancy theory, the affect theory of social exchange, and evolutionary theory. This model elucidates the core antecedents, mediators, outcomes, moderators, and interventions forming the nomological network of work related loneliness, including cross-level influences within teams and among leaders. Our review also identifies a number of promising areas for future inquiry to improve our understanding and measurement of loneliness, the process of experiencing and managing loneliness in the workplace, and potential interventions to reduce it. Finally, we provide tangible guidance for organizations and practitioners on how to address and mitigate employee loneliness. Ultimately, our review underscores the complex nature of loneliness and work and establishes a foundation for advancing both scholarly discourse and organizational practices in this critical domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.