Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41395220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Efficacy of neuromodulation techniques (TMS and tDCS) in cancer pain management: A systematic review.

Sara M Fernandes, Joana Peixoto, Pedro F S Rodrigues, Ana Bártolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara M FernandesCINTESIS.UPT@RISE-Health, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Joana PeixotoDepartment of Psychology and Education, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Pedro F S RodriguesCINTESIS.UPT@RISE-Health, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Ana BártoloCINTESIS.UPT@RISE-Health, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global incidence of oncological disease is rising, driven by increased longevity and greater exposure to carcinogens. Pain remains one of the most prevalent and disabling symptoms among cancer patients, requiring urgent evaluation and treatment. However, selecting an effective therapeutic approach remains a challenge. Neuromodulation techniques such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have shown promise in managing chronic pain across various conditions, but evidence in the oncological context is still limited. This study systematically reviewed the effects of rTMS and tDCS on cancer pain management. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and CENTRAL, following PRISMA guidelines, yielding 657 potentially relevant studies. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Eight randomized controlled trials from four countries were included, involving 349 patients: three employing rTMS and five using tDCS. The studies examined diverse patient groups, cancer types, and neuromodulation protocols, producing mixed but generally short‑term reductions in pain. Indirect evidence suggests that rTMS may induce faster but shorter‑lived analgesia, whereas tDCS may be associated with modest persistence when delivered in repeated sessions. Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence that non‑invasive brain stimulation techniques may contribute to cancer pain management. Future research should optimize stimulation parameters, conduct direct comparisons, and explore integration with pharmacological and behavioral strategies to enhance long‑term effectiveness.

Indexed as

Cancer, Pain, Neuromodulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Transcranial magnetic stimulationRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID41395220
PMCPMC12701670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.