ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Efficacy of neuromodulation techniques (TMS and tDCS) in cancer pain management: A systematic review.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global incidence of oncological disease is rising, driven by increased longevity and greater exposure to carcinogens. Pain remains one of the most prevalent and disabling symptoms among cancer patients, requiring urgent evaluation and treatment. However, selecting an effective therapeutic approach remains a challenge. Neuromodulation techniques such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) have shown promise in managing chronic pain across various conditions, but evidence in the oncological context is still limited. This study systematically reviewed the effects of rTMS and tDCS on cancer pain management. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, and CENTRAL, following PRISMA guidelines, yielding 657 potentially relevant studies. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Eight randomized controlled trials from four countries were included, involving 349 patients: three employing rTMS and five using tDCS. The studies examined diverse patient groups, cancer types, and neuromodulation protocols, producing mixed but generally short‑term reductions in pain. Indirect evidence suggests that rTMS may induce faster but shorter‑lived analgesia, whereas tDCS may be associated with modest persistence when delivered in repeated sessions. Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence that non‑invasive brain stimulation techniques may contribute to cancer pain management. Future research should optimize stimulation parameters, conduct direct comparisons, and explore integration with pharmacological and behavioral strategies to enhance long‑term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.