Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41395186›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Full-Endoscopic Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy.

Zhenfei Wang, Mengzi Hu, Zijin Liu, Jinhui Bu, Bo He, Quan Zhang, Long Xu, Juan Gao, Chao Ma, Guangwang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhenfei Wang *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mengzi Hu *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zijin LiuXuzhou No.1 Middle School, Class 12 of Senior Two, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jinhui BuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Changsha Central Hospital, University of South China, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
Bo HeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Quan ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Long XuThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Juan GaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chao MaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guangwang LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic ultrasonic bone scalpel (EUBS) in percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 41 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) who underwent surgical treatment and were followed up at Xuzhou Central Hospital between January 2019 and June 2023. Among them, 22 patients were treated using EUBS and 19 using a high-speed drill (HSD). The two groups were compared in terms of operative time, bone fenestration time, frequency of surgical field blurring, length of hospital stay, complication rate, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, C2-7 Cobb angle, and intervertebral disc height at the operative level. Results: The follow-up period ranged from 16 to 36 months. The bone fenestration time in the EUBS group was significantly shorter than that in the HSD group (P < 0.05), although no significant differences were observed in total operative time or frequency of surgical field blurring. The postoperative complication rate in the EUBS group was 0%, which was not statistically different from the 5.26% observed in the HSD group. Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS and JOA scores from three months post-surgery to final follow-up, with no significant differences between the groups. Similarly, no significant intergroup differences were found in C2-7 Cobb angle or intervertebral disc height at any time point. Conclusion: The application of EUBS in PECD is safe and effective for treating CSR. It can reduce bone fenestration time and improve surgical efficiency.

Indexed as

cervical spondylotic radiculopathyendoscopic ultrasonic bone scalpelpercutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy

Identifiers

PMID41395186
PMCPMC12701649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.