ArticlePopulation and environment2025
Fertility Intentions in Rural Malawi After Cyclone Idai.
Article in Population and environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- It's Raining Babies? Flood Exposures and Fertility in Bangladesh.Population and development review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental disruptions such as extreme weather events can intensify household uncertainty by creating financial, marital, and housing instability. In this paper, we draw on unique interview data to advance knowledge of fertility intentions and the role of environmentally induced uncertainty in shaping them. We use in-depth interviews collected in rural Malawi in July 2019 to examine the motivations behind fertility intentions at a moment of heightened uncertainty, the months following the destruction brought by Cyclone Idai. Among respondents with children, the majority planned to wait at least four years before having another child. From the narratives of parents' reproductive plans, we develop a typology of respondents who prefer long inter-birth intervals. Analyses reveal that some respondents' motivations are consistent with traditional spacing intentions, whereas others reflect their fundamental uncertainty about the future and the chances of regaining economic and household stability in a natural-resource contingent context. Our results are foundational for building theory to understand the relationship between environmental forces and fertility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.