Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41395164›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Recruitment and retention in young adult health research: Motivations and barriers.

Ruixiao Wang, Julie Schweitzer, Gloria Zavala Perez, Silvia C Molina, Theresa H M Keegan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruixiao WangClinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6071-2218
Julie SchweitzerClinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Gloria Zavala PerezClinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Silvia C MolinaClinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Theresa H M KeeganClinical and Translational Science Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To provide insights into the motivations, challenges, and preferred methods of contact that influence the recruitment and retention of young adults (YAs) in health research. Methods: We designed, collected, and analyzed two surveys targeting YAs aged 18-39 years through the Amazon MTurk platform, to assess factors influencing recruitment and retention in health studies. The recruitment survey ( Results: The recruitment survey indicated that 88% of YAs were willing to participate in health studies, with a preference for online formats (78%). Social media, particularly Facebook (53%), was endorsed as the most common platform for discovering research opportunities. Monetary incentives were reported as the top motivator across all age groups, especially for those aged 35-39 years, with gift cards endorsed as the most appealing to participants aged 18-34. Retention survey results indicated that email (100%) was the most preferred method for maintaining engagement, followed by text messages (78.9%) and social media (62.2%). Text messages (65%), regular updates (56%) and sharing of study results (54%) were identified as key factors for maintaining participant engagement. Conclusion: Our findings identify that YA participation is driven by a mix of altruistic motivations, such as contributing to the community and research, and personal motivations, including personal health benefits and financial incentives, emphasizing the need for strategies that address both aspects of recruitment and retention motivations.

Indexed as

Adolescenthealth studiesrecruitmentretentionyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID41395164
PMCPMC12695509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.