ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Inflammatory and Liver Fibrosis Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Specific diagnostic value of systemic immune-inflammation indices combined with nutritional and tumor markers in the stage diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Perioperative Systemic Inflammation Response Index Dynamics for Postoperative Pulmonary Infection Following Esophagectomy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Prognostic heterogeneity remains a challenge in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following curative resection. Inflammatory markers such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), as well as liver fibrosis markers including gamma-glutamyltransferase-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR), gamma-glutamyltransferase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), and AST-to-ALT ratio (AAR), have shown prognostic potential. This study aimed to evaluate their predictive value for survival after resection. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 187 patients with HCC who underwent curative resection between 2008 and 2022. Preoperative inflammatory and fibrosis markers, along with clinical variables, were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and nomogram models were used to estimate 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. Results: Multivariate analysis identified elevated SII, AAR, low PNI, tumor thrombus, and postoperative complications as independent predictors of poor OS, while only tumor thrombus and SIRI independently predicted DFS. SII, AAR, and PNI were also significantly associated with aggressive tumor characteristics. Patients with all three adverse markers (high SII, high AAR, low PNI) showed significantly poorer OS and DFS. A prognostic score incorporating these markers and nomogram models were constructed to predict OS and DFS after resection. Conclusion: SII, AAR, and PNI are independent prognostic indicators for HCC following resection. The proposed prognostic score and nomograms may assist in individualized survival assessment and postoperative decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.