ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Dementia etiology classification using NULISA plasma biomarkers and machine learning.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate antemortem differentiation among dementia etiologies remains challenging, particularly for atypical or mixed clinical presentations. Multiplexed plasma proteomics paired with supervised machine-learning offers a minimally invasive and accessible approach for differential diagnosis.
methodsPlasma from 194 participants was analyzed using the NULISA CNS 120+ plasma biomarker panel. Differentially abundant protein patterns associated with AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Lewy body disease, and vascular disease were identified. These features were used to train supervised XGBoost classifier models. Models were then applied to participants with mild cognitive impairment to generate data-driven predictions of etiology.
resultsNULISA plasma biomarkers revealed disease-specific protein patterns. XGBoost classifiers differentiated disease etiologies with high specificity. Application of the models to participants with mild cognitive impairment yielded robust etiologic predictions. DISCUSSION: These results support the feasibility of using multiplexed NULISA plasma proteomics, combined with machine learning, for differential diagnosis of complex neurodegenerative dementia etiologies. Highlights: Multiplex plasma proteomics revealed distinct protein markers of dementia subtypesSupervised XGBoost classifiers accurately distinguished each dementia etiologyModel application to unknown etiologies produced interpretable probability profilesThe combined NULISA-machine learning framework demonstrates diagnostic feasibility. Research in Context: Systematic review: The authors reviewed the literature using traditional sources (e.g. PubMed), meeting abstracts and presentations. NULISA technology has been utilized to analyze blood biomarkers in people with neurological diseases and differential protein expression based on clinical diagnosis and presumed etiologies has been observed. These citations are appropriately cited.Interpretation: Our findings indicate that machine learning can be used in combination with NULISA technology to improve etiology prediction in people with dementia.Future directions: Future studies using larger, more well-balanced participant cohorts will enable better understanding of the plasma biomarkers and demographic factors that best discriminate between dementia etiologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.