ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Inhibition of CRM1 reverses hypoxia-driven chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukemia via overcoming HIF-1α-mediated lysosomal sequestration.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R-AML), hypoxia-driven chemoresistance is orchestrated by HIF-1α-induced P-glycoprotein (P-gp) overexpression and subsequent lysosomal sequestration of anthracyclines. Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of the HIF-1α prolyl-hydroxylase PHD2 is controlled by chromosome region maintenance 1 (CRM1), which is frequently up-regulated in AML; however, whether pharmacologic CRM1 inhibition restores PHD2 nuclear availability to accelerate HIF-1α degradation and reverse chemoresistance remains undefined. Methods: AML cell lines (MV4-11 and MOLM13) were cultured under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. The effects of hypoxia on drug sensitivity, intracellular drug distribution, and protein expression were assessed using CCK-8 assays, immunofluorescence, Western blot, and flow cytometry. Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of P-gp, HIF-1α, and CRM1 was performed to validate their roles in chemoresistance. Hypoxia-adapted zebrafish CHT xenografts were employed for Results: Hypoxia reduced AML cell sensitivity to DNR, increased HIF-1α and P-gp expression, and promoted lysosomal sequestration of DNR. Inhibition of P-gp or HIF-1α reversed these effects. CRM1 and PHD2 expression increased under hypoxia, but nuclear accumulation of PHD2 decreased. Selinexor restored PHD2 nuclear localization, promoted HIF-1α degradation, reduced P-gp expression, and enhanced DNR nuclear accumulation. Combination treatment with Selinexor and DNR significantly increased apoptosis and DNA damage Conclusions: CRM1 inhibition by Selinexor re-establishes nuclear PHD2 residency, increases the degradation of HIF-1α in hypoxia, abrogates P-gp-mediated lysosomal anthracycline trapping, and confers potent
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.