Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394724›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Two views of the brain are reconciled by a unifying principle of maximal information processing.

Leandro J Fosque, Woodrow L Shew, ShiNung Ching, Keith B Hengen

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leandro J FosqueDepartment of Biology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0638-5514
Woodrow L ShewDepartment of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR USA 72701.ORCID 0000-0003-0679-1766
ShiNung ChingDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4063-7068
Keith B HengenDepartment of Biology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-4090

Funding

SCH: Tracking Individual Brain State Trajectories: Methods and Applications in Precision Neurocritical CareR01NS130693 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHING, SHINUNG, GUERRIERO, REJEAN M · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
Robust circuit computation in freely behaving animals.R01NS118442 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HENGEN, KEITH B. · 2023 to 2024
$1.0M
Tunable multi-timescale cortical dynamics: fundamental theory and practical toolsR01DA060744 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI Andrea Katherine Barreiro, Cheng Ly · 2024 to 2026
$976k
High dimensional motor coding and motor dysfunction in Rett syndromeR15NS135396 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI SHEW, WOODROW L. · 2024 to 2024
$450k
Extracting network-level homeostatic rules for sleep/wake statesF32NS138250 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leandro Jonathan Fosque · 2024 to 2026
$225k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA060744NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS138250NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118442NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130693NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS135396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is selective pressure on brains to maximize computational capacity and adaptability in an unpredictable world. Prior work suggests that this demand is satisfied by a regime called criticality, which has emerged as a powerful, unifying framework for understanding how computation can arise in biological systems. However, this framework has been confined to high-dimensional network models. At first glance, this appears irreconcilable with many of the foundational, low dimensional dynamical models that have driven progress in theoretical and computational neuroscience for a century. If criticality is a universal principle, then all models that accurately capture significant aspects of brain function should be constrained by the same fact. Lacking a definition of criticality in low-dimensional dynamical systems, this has been impossible to evaluate. Here, we develop a mathematical definition of criticality that transcends dimensionality by recognizing temporal scale invariance as analogous to spatial scale invariance that defines criticality in large systems. We demonstrate that there are two mechanistically distinct sources of criticality at bifurcations, one deterministic and one that emerges from noise fluctuations. Further, we show that some but not all canonical bifurcations in neural models exhibit criticality, and only a subset of these are biologically plausible. We conduct numerical analyses demonstrating that information processing capacity peaks at critical bifurcations, and evaluate which historically influential neural models contain these bifurcations. Our results establish criticality as a universal neurobiological principle that is accessible to systems of any dimensionality. This unifies disparate modeling approaches under a single computational framework and suggests that optimal information processing emerges not from model-specific mechanisms but from fundamental properties of critical dynamics themselves.

Identifiers

PMID41394724
PMCPMC12697366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.