ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Unsupervised mapping of causal relations between brain lesions and behavior.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human lesion studies offer one of the most direct routes to investigating the causal relations between brain regions and behavioral outcomes in circumstances where experimental interventions are highly restricted. However, these studies face a major challenge in identifying the right level of granularity at which brain regions and behavioral outcomes should be analyzed to identify the association between lesions to specific brain regions and specific behavioral outcomes. Here we showcase a novel data-driven approach, Causal Feature Learning (CFL), that learns the appropriate level of analysis and the relation between lesion and cognitive impairment at the same time. The method avoids specifying brain regions and specific outcome measures a priori, allowing for the discovery of new cross-cutting lesion-behavior maps. We show that CFL robustly recovers lesion behavior maps in a simulated dataset where Canonical Correlation Analysis fails to provide interpretable results. We then show that CFL recovers known lesion-behavior maps for language deficits and visuospatial processing using a large dataset of lesion subjects, and finally we illustrate how CFL can be used to identify new groupings of outcomes when mapping lesions to depression symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.