ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
To the homeRNAmax: Developing an Improved Blood Self-Collection and Stabilization Platform for Remote Transcriptomic Studies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shifting human subjects research from research sites to participants' homes removes barriers to participation, including transportation and scheduling difficulties. Previously, we developed homeRNA, a kit for immediate stabilization of RNA in self-collected blood using a custom-engineered tube containing RNA stabilizer fluid. The stabilized RNA is extracted and used for downstream gene expression analysis. Here, we introduce homeRNAmax, which improves our original design by interfacing with a commercially available blood collection tube (BD Microtainer), allowing homeRNAmax to be used with any blood collection method that uses this tube and doubling the possible sample volume that can be collected and stabilized compared to the original homeRNA. Through a pilot study (n=19 participants), we show that homeRNAmax (with the Tasso+ blood collection device) produces RNA samples of sufficient quality (mean RIN=7.8) and yield (mean yield=1.93 μg) for downstream analysis and can reach participants across the United States, who generally (n=17/19) found the homeRNAmax kit easy to use. A key aspect of the homeRNA and homeRNAmax platforms is a fluidic feature that prevents the RNA stabilizer from spilling, however our previous work had not yet fully characterized the mechanism of this feature. Here, we developed a theoretical model of the spill-resistant feature. In brief, fluid in the tube is suspended due to a balance of pressures; an increase in air volume within the tube reduces the air pressure above the fluid, creating a small vacuum, and preventing fluid leakage. Overall, we show that homeRNAmax is a user-friendly, effective tool for remote blood RNA stabilization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.