Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394527›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2023

Asymptotics of Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation in Random Features Regression.

Youngsoo Baek, Samuel I Berchuck, Sayan Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youngsoo BaekDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705.
Samuel I BerchuckDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705.
Sayan MukherjeeCenter for Scalable Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig 04105.

Funding

Development of a program to assess and treat distress in glaucoma patients using an automated EHR-derived AI algorithmR00EY033027 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Samuel Isaac Berchuck · 2024 to 2026
$728k
Development of a program to assess and treat distress in glaucoma patients using an automated EHR-derived AI algorithmK99EY033027 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERCHUCK, SAMUEL ISAAC · 2021 to 2022
$230k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY033027NEI NIH HHS R00 EY033027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we compare and contrast the behavior of the posterior predictive distribution to the risk of the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator for the random features regression model in the overparameterized regime. We will focus on the variance of the posterior predictive distribution (Bayesian model average) and compare its asymptotics to that of the risk of the MAP estimator. In the regime where the model dimensions grow faster than any constant multiple of the number of samples, asymptotic agreement between these two quantities is governed by the phase transition in the signal-to-noise ratio. They also asymptotically agree with each other when the number of samples grows faster than any constant multiple of model dimensions. Numerical simulations illustrate finer distributional properties of the two quantities for finite dimensions. We conjecture they have Gaussian fluctuations and exhibit similar properties as found by previous authors in a Gaussian sequence model, which is of independent theoretical interest.

Identifiers

PMID41394527
PMCPMC12700357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.