Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394518›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025

No Kidney Left Behind: Rescuing Unused Donor Kidneys for Transplant at the First Centralized Assessment and Repair Center.

Christopher L Jaynes, William C Goggins, Matthew L Holzner, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang, Henri G D Leuvenink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancements inFrontiers in transplantation · 2026
    Review
  6. Nurturing a Sustainable Transplantation Journey: the best of ESOT Congress 2025.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  7. Editorial: Current developments in artificial organs and engineeredTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher L JaynesDepartment of Surgery-Organ Donation and Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
William C GogginsDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Matthew L HolznerRecanti/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Jacqueline Garonzik-WangUniversity of Wisconsin Department of Surgery, Madison, WI, United States.
Henri G D LeuveninkDepartment of Surgery-Organ Donation and Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rescue of non-used kidneys may be facilitated using sub-normothermic acellular machine perfusion (SNAP), which can prolong safe preservation times and provide additional viability assessment. While blood-based normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been utilized internationally, barriers to adoption of NMP in the US include limited availability, staffing and facility resource limitations, geographic distances between donor and recipient hospitals, blood shortages, and reliance on hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP). To overcome obstacles to adoption, the first centralized kidney Assessment and Repair Center (ARC) was established in West Lafayette, Indiana. Organized as an independent public benefit company, this center was designed to provide sub-normothermic acellular perfusion (SNAP) and assessment services to rescue unused/hard-to-place (HTP) kidneys. An acellular, human serum albumin-based perfusate was chosen, and a second cold ischemic time (CIT) was validated during pre-clinical testing. Between April 2024- May 2025, 158 unused deceased donor kidneys were transported to the ARC, resulting in 142 transplants (90%) after SNAP assessment. SNAP is feasible when performed by a centralized ARC and reduces kidney discard rates by providing objective viability assessment data. Moreover, SNAP allows for extended preservation times of nearly 70 h, enabling improved logistical planning and broader sharing of deceased donor kidneys.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationOrgan PreservationPerfusionTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultCold IschemiaFemaleHumansIndianaMaleMiddle AgedTissue DonorsARCex vivo kidneyNMPnormothermic perfusionSNAP

Identifiers

PMID41394518
PMCPMC12698490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.