ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Triazoles Versus Echinocandins for the First-Line Treatment of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Propensity Score-Weighted Multicenter Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research trends in COPD-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis over the past two decades: a bibliometric and topic modelling analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic criteria for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in COPD patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Triazoles (eg, isavuconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole) are the first-line treatment for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), but their use can be limited by drug interactions, hepatotoxicity, and emerging azole resistance. Recent guidelines recommend echinocandins as a safe and well-tolerated first-line alternative. Methods: In this multicenter observational study across 9 treatment centers, we included all consecutive patients with IPA from 1 January 2014 to 1 June 2024. We compared 30-day overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome and 90-day OS as the secondary outcome between patients receiving triazoles versus echinocandins as first-line therapy. Propensity score adjustment was applied to address baseline characteristic imbalances. Results: We included 177 patients, of whom 153 (86%) received triazoles as first-line therapy (69 voriconazole, 54 isavuconazole, 30 posaconazole). Before propensity score adjustment, patients treated with echinocandins were significantly sicker, with higher rates of intensive care treatment (95% vs 75%, Conclusions: Using echinocandins as alternative first-line treatment for IPA may result in poorer survival outcomes and should be approached with caution until further trials confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.