Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41394494›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2025

Optical and simulated visual outcomes of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses tested in clinically relevant decentration and tilt conditions.

Fátima Cuellar, Fidel Vega, David Madrid, José F Alfonso, Maria S Millan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fátima CuellarApplied Optics and Image Processing Group, Optics and Optometry Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08222 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2019-7189
Fidel VegaApplied Optics and Image Processing Group, Optics and Optometry Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08222 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-0872
David MadridClinical and Experimental Eye Research (CEER). Optometry and Vision Department, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Arcos del Jalón 118, 28037 Madrid, Spain.
José F AlfonsoFernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Avda. Dres. Fernández-Vega 114, 33012 Oviedo, Spain.
Maria S MillanApplied Optics and Image Processing Group, Optics and Optometry Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08222 Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-2373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of intraocular lens (IOL) misalignment on image quality under clinically relevant conditions (0.2, 0.4 mm decentration and 2°, 4° tilt). Two presbyopia-correcting IOLs, an extended depth of focus (EDOF) (Alcon Vivity) and a diffractive multifocal (Alcon PanOptix), were tested. Through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF)-based measures were taken using an on-bench model eye with average corneal spherical aberration and apertures of 3.0 and 4.5 mm. Optical image quality and simulated visual acuity (VA) were assessed for both aligned and misaligned IOLs. The aligned EDOF lens showed superior distance vision quality compared to the multifocal, particularly with the 4.5 mm pupil. The EDOF lens was, however, more sensitive to decentration than the multifocal, which showed very low sensitivity across far, intermediate, and near regions with both apertures. Degradation with IOL tilt occurred at a slower rate than with decentration. Despite the optical degradation produced by mild misalignment (up to 0.4 mm decentration and 4° tilt), the predicted VA demonstrates that these effects should be negligible on postoperative vision with a 3 mm pupil. This holds true not only at a far distance, but also at the relevant intermediate and near foci.

Identifiers

PMID41394494
PMCPMC12698083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.