ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Early Outcome of Intracapsular Fracture Neck of Femur Managed with Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Cancellous Screws: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: CCS fixation is considered a gold standard for stabilization of displaced intracapsular fracture neck of the femur (DICNF). Recently, a minimally invasive implant has been developed for these fractures called the Femoral Neck System (FNS). Currently, there is no comparative prospective study to assess the superiority of one over the other. Thus, this study was conducted to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of DICNF managed with FNS and CCS in adults. Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study was performed in patients between 18 and 60 years of age with DICNF managed with FNS or CCS. Thirty-four patients ( Results: The mean Harris hip score in the CCS subgroup was 72.82 ± 29.34 compared to 88.82 ± 23.58 in the FNS subgroup, which was statistically significant. Intraoperative duration in the CCS group was 53.41 ± 18.94 min and in the FNS group was 38.12 ± 6.81 min, Conclusion: At 12 months of follow-up, the mean HHS was 88.82 in the FNS subgroup and 72.82 in the CCS subgroup where the difference was statistically significant. The mean operating time in the FNS subgroup was 38.12 min, and in the CCS subgroup, it was 53.41 min where the difference was statistically significant. 94.1% of cases in FNS and 88.2% of cases in the CCS group attained union at 12 month follow-up. However, the difference between 2 subgroups was not statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.