ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
MRI Evaluation of Paraspinal Muscle Thickness and Interspinous Gap at the Lumbar Level: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The erector spinae (ES), one of the paraspinal muscles, is important in invasive procedures performed on the lumbar spine. There are a few data on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of this muscle and interspinous gap (ISG). This study aimed to measure bilateral ES thickness at L4-5 and L5-S1 levels, and ISG at L4-5 level in lumbar MRI. Methods: Between May 2020 and 2021, patients who presented with complaints of low back pain and underwent lumbar MRI with the preliminary diagnosis of piriformis syndrome were retrospectively scanned. This syndrome was chosen to ideally evaluate paraspinal muscle dimensions in a population without disc herniation. A total of 408 cases (225 males and 183 females) without disc herniation were identified, and ES muscles (REST, LEST, and AEST) and ISG measurements were performed via picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). Results: At the L4-5 level, mean REST was 40.11 ± 4.46 mm, mean LEST was 39.83 ± 4.57 mm and AEST was 39.97 ± 4.51 mm. There was no statistical difference according to gender and age ( Conclusion: The identification and thickness measurement of paraspinal muscles are important in lumbar surgical interventions. For the first time, ES muscle thickness and ISG were evaluated in routine lumbar MRI scans, and valuable data that could contribute to the literature were obtained only with the use of PACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.