ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
The Effect of Surgeon's Experience on Implant Selection in the Management of Geriatric Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate how orthopedic surgeon's professional experience affects implant selection in the surgical treatment of geriatric unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. Methods: Plain radiographs of 107 patients aged ≥ 75 years with AO type 31 A2.2 or A2.3 fractures, Singh index ≤ 3, and cumulative ambulation score ≥ 5 were assessed by orthopedic surgeons with varying levels of experience. Surgeons chose between proximal femoral nail (PFN), dynamic hip screw (DHS), and hip arthroplasty (total or hemi) for each case. Participants were grouped by experience: junior (≤ 5 years), middle (6-10 years), and senior (≥ 11 years), each with 9 surgeons. Preferences across groups were statistically compared. Results: All observers chose PFN or hemiarthroplasty (HA), while none preferred DHS or total arthroplasty. Junior surgeons predominantly preferred PFN. As experience increased, preference shifted toward HA. Senior surgeons overwhelmingly chose HA, while middle-experienced surgeons preferred PFN and HA at close rates. Conclusion: Implant selection is shaped not only by fracture type but also by the surgeon's clinical experience. Surgeons with greater experience more frequently choose arthroplasty, likely due to greater technical ability, complication management skills, and awareness of long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.