ArticleF1000Research2025
Development of an Instrument for Evaluating the Implementation of Occupational Health Programmes in Hospitals.
Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospitals pose a high level of hazard and risks, particularly ones related to occupational health, whose overarching objective is to ensure both healthy workers and a healthy workplace, which can be achieved through effective risk management. This research aims to develop an assessment instrument tailored to hospital occupational safety and health units and their stakeholders across Indonesia to assess hospitals' efforts to protect workers, with a focus on occupational health services programmes based on identified hazards. It is a qualitative exploratory study. Data collection was made through an in-depth literature review to identify occupational health risk factors in hospitals, focusing primarily on studies involving health risk assessment and/or reports of occupational disease or suspected cases of diseases. This was supported by in-depth interviews and field observations in three hospitals: a government hospital, a private hospital and a teaching hospital. The identified risk factors contributing to hospital workers' mortality and morbidity were then analysed and formed into measurable indicators. These indicators serve as the basis for developing an instrument prototype to semi quantitatively assess the implementation of occupational health services in the hospitals. The prototype was developed by adapting and modifying the Hospital Safety and Health Management System Self-Assessment Questionnaire from OSHA and then subjected to validation through a 2-day FGD involving experts, practitioners, professional organisations, and other authorities in similar fields of study. The instrument consists of seven main sections; 53 statements with a maximum total score of 159; in addition to guidance. In conclusion, the instrument is a strategic tool that can be used by hospitals to improve the effectiveness of occupational health service implementation in a sustainable manner. Regulatory support, management commitment, and involvement of all elements in a hospital are the keys to realising a healthy, safe, productive workplace for the whole hospital community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.