ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Clinical value of bundled care protocols in enhancing postoperative recovery among lung cancer patients.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of bundled care protocols in enhancing postoperative recovery among lung cancer patients. Methodology: This was a retrospective study. A total of 120 patients undergoing radical lung cancer surgery in the thoracic surgery department of Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from November 2022 to November 2024 were enrolled randomly assigned to the study group and the control group using a random number table (n=60 each group). The control group received routine nursing care, while the study group was managed using a bundled care protocol. Indicators including pulmonary function parameters, immune status, postoperative complication rates, quality-of-life scores and satisfaction levels were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Results: Post-intervention, the study group demonstrated significant improvements in FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC and PEF values compared to the control group(P=0.00). Immune indicators, including CD3 Conclusion: Bundled care protocols demonstrate significant clinical benefits for lung cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, including enhanced pulmonary function recovery, improved immune reconstitution, reduced postoperative complication rates and elevated quality of life and care satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.