ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Exploring the variation of emotional intelligence in health sciences students: A mixed method study across pre-clinical and clinical years.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the variation in levels of emotional intelligence of students in pre-clinical and clinical years of health sciences and to explore what factors were associated with differing levels of EI. Methodology: This mixed-method study was done at the University of Lahore from March to August 2023. Quantitative data was collected using the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) from 248 students, 62 participants were recruited from each discipline of health sciences students. Three focus group discussions and four one-on-one interviews were performed. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data was done based on Daniel's Goleman model of EI's theoretical framework. Results: One-third (32.30%) of health sciences students had low EI levels. Physiotherapy clinical years had a higher mean EI score (141.13 ± 13.42 SD). In MBBS clinical years, EI decreased (p> 0.02), while for BDS, physiotherapy, and optometry, it remained non-significant (p> 0.05). However, proportion of students with moderate EI declined in MBBS (from 67.7% to 41.9%) and optometry (from 83.9% to 67.7%) but increased in physiotherapy (from 64.5% to 77.4%) and BDS (from 58.1% to 61.3%). Five key factors were identified influencing EI levels: self-awareness, social awareness, teacher role modelling, self-management, and communication skills. Conclusion: Students' EI varied across and within disciplines, depending on self-awareness, the working environment, and the responses of their teachers and patients. Soft skills should be explicitly incorporated into the curriculum and reinforced through positive role modelling by teachers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.