ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Retrospective evaluation of transhepatic biliary stent placement in patients undergoing hepaticojejunostomy.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operations performed by surgeons all over the world. Bile duct injury (BDI) occurs in 0.2-0.6 % of cholecystectomies. Methodology: We aimed to investigate the effects of transhepatic transanastomotic stent use in patients who underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy due to iatrogenic bile duct injury. The study included 37 patients who underwent R&Y hepticojejunostomy anastomosis due to iatrogenic bile duct injury at the General Surgery Clinic of the Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Medical Faculty Hospital between January 2010 to July 2024. Results: A total of 37 hepaticojejunostomy patients were included in the study; 16 (%43.2) received transhepatic stent and 21 (%56.8) did not receive stent. No mortality occurred in any of the patients. It was observed that the rate of Bismuth Type-1 was statistically significantly higher in the group without stent placement and Bismuth Type-4 was statistically significantly higher in the group with stent placement (p<0.001). The mean timing time was 13.75±7.37 days in the group without stent placement and 4.00±3.30 days in the group with stent placement, which was significantly higher in the group without stent placement (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of complication development (p=0.933). Conclusions: As a result, although we prefer the use of transanastomotic stents in bile duct reconstruction after biliary injury in selected cases, we think that studies with larger series are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.